Introductory Concepts
Elementary Relationships
Extensions of Verbal Behavior
Multiple Controlling Relationships
Building on the Elementary Relationships
;

7.7 Point-to-Point Correspondence Example #2

Saying “fox” as the result of seeing the word “fox” is an example of point-to-point correspondence. It makes no difference whether the stimulus is auditory or visual. It also makes no difference whether the response is vocal or written. Writing “fox” as the result of hearing someone say “fox” still illustrates point-to-point correspondence.

Point-to-Point Correspondence

A relationship between a discriminative stimulus and the response it controls with the following features:

The discriminative stimulus must have two or more components

The response must have two or more components

The first part of the stimulus must control the first part of the response, the second part of the stimulus must control the second part of the response, etc.

Formal or dynamic characteristics of the stimulus

Formal or dynamic characteristics of the response

Fox vs. fox in 7.7 Point-to-Point Correspondence Example #2.
1 Comment
Collapse Comments

point to point correspondence is only concerned with verbal communication?

This section is for the civil and public discussion of the content of this page. We reserve the right to moderate and remove comments that are irrelevant, disrespectful, hateful, harassing, threatening, or spamlike. If you are experiencing a technical issue, please contact our helpdesk for assistance.

Leave a Comment