The Training Curriculum for Supervisors of ABA Technicians in Autism Programs (Standard)

Dr. Breanne Hartley

The Training Curriculum for Supervisors of ABA Technicians in Autism Programs is designed to train supervisors and aspiring supervisors in evidence-based methods of supervising staff who provide ABA (applied behavior analysis) services for people with autism. The content is based on over four decades of ABA research and application on staff training and supervision as well as the authors’ hands-on experience. The content includes critical supervision knowledge and skills coinciding with the Behavior Analysis Certification Board (BACB©) task list for effective supervision, and provides the BACB’s required eight hours of supervision training. The curriculum is performance and competency-based, requiring trainees to meet classroom and on-the-job criteria to successfully complete the training. The Curriculum content is relevant for supervisors of staff providing ABA services across a variety of settings, including center-based programs, homes, schools, and clinics.

[su_accordion]
[su_spoiler title=”About the Speaker” open=”no” style=”default” icon=”plus”]
Breanne Hartley, PhD, BCBA-D is the Chief Clinical O�cer at LittleStar ABA Therapy. She obtained certification as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst in 2007 and obtained a doctorate degree in Behavior Analysis in 2009 from Western Michigan University, specializing in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Developmental Disabilities.
[/su_spoiler]

[su_spoiler title=”Survey Results” open=”no” style=”default” icon=”plus”]
[surveyresults module=”The Training Curriculum for Supervisors of ABA Technicians in Autism Programs”]
[/su_spoiler]
[/su_accordion]

Addressing Pseudoscientific Practices in Applied Behavior Analysis (Standard)

Dr. Angela Capuano

Pseudoscientific practices are commonly used and promoted in the field of developmental disabilities. Behavior analysts should anticipate encountering such treatments in practice and understand their ethical obligations with regard to these practices. This presentation will present a model to prepare behavior analysts for how to address situations in which clients may ask them to use pseudoscientific practices, as well as reviewing resources for ethical guidance and evidence-based practices.

[su_accordion]
[su_spoiler title=”About the Speakers” open=”no” style=”default” icon=”plus”]
Angela Capuano is a licensed clinical psychologist and BCBA-D who teaches in the undergraduate and graduate Applied Behavior Analysis program at the University of Michigan-Dearborn. She also practices and sees children, families, and young adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder and other mental health disorders.

Dr. Kim Killu is a professor in the special education and applied behavior analysis programs at the University of Michigan-Dearborn. She has worked with all categories of exceptionality as a psychologist and a Board Certi�ed Behavior Analyst.
[/su_spoiler]

[su_spoiler title=”Survey Results” open=”no” style=”default” icon=”plus”]
[surveyresults module=”Addressing Pseudoscientific Practices in Applied Behavior Analysis”]
[/su_spoiler]
[/su_accordion]

Assessment and Treatment of Problem Behaviors within an Outpatient Clinic (Standard)

Dr. Kristen Kalymon

BCBA ethical codes mandate the use of a functional assessment prior to implementing treatment. Accurately identifying a function and selecting an appropriate treatment are fundamental skills for any practitioner. Students learn the importance of functional behavior assessment and selecting functionally relevant interventions; they are not often taught how to select the best alternative given the limitations of the environment. While experimental functional analyses are the gold standard of assessment methods, most practitioners face barriers to their implementation. Difficulties include low probability for observing problem behaviors with limited time for observation, training requirements to carry out the analysis, and the physical space required. Several studies suggest that using descriptive functional evaluation methods, such as Antecedent-Behavior-Consequence (ABC), are a nice alternative due to their ease of administration and results often closely align with functional analyses. Following functional assessment, practitioners must select appropriate treatments. It can be challenging for practitioners to simultaneously consider all of the relevant client and environmental variables that impact treatment selection. Several groups have created decision-making algorithms for selecting treatments for problem behavior. These algorithms ask practitioners to consider the goals of the intervention, needs of the child, resources needed for implementation, and limitations of the environment by considering questions that will lead to differential treatment selection. This talk will give an overview of the clinical use of descriptive functional assessment and decision-making algorithms used within an outpatient clinic where resources are limited, caregivers are responsible for implementation, and environments are unable to tolerate increased rates of problem behavior.

[su_accordion]
[su_spoiler title=”About the Speaker” open=”no” style=”default” icon=”plus”]
Dr. Kalymon has expertise assessing and treating behavioral concerns displayed by children and adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders, as well as other developmental disabilities, through the use of evidence-based parent training and individual psychotherapy. Areas of specialization include behavioral excesses (i.e., tantrums, self-injury, aggression, and noncompliance) as well as behavioral de�cits (i.e., increasing sleep, toileting, and coping skills). Dr. Kalymon received her Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, completed an internship and fellowship at the Kennedy Krieger Institute and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, and then remained on staff�as a supervising psychologist and director of clinical operations prior to transitioning to Michigan.
[/su_spoiler]

[su_spoiler title=”Survey Results” open=”no” style=”default” icon=”plus”]
[surveyresults module=”Assessment and Treatment of Problem Behaviors within an Outpatient Clinic”]
[/su_spoiler]
[/su_accordion]

An Examination of Linear and Ratio Graphs (Standard)

Dr. Rick Kubina

Line graphs and visual analysis have served as the engine of evaluation and decision making for applied behavior analysis. The advantages of line graphs include providing treatment data visually and summarizing a person’s performance across a given time interval. Line graphs also communicate the sequence of treatments, the time spent in treatment phases, and the magnitude of behavioral change. Yet visual analysis has a history of low interrater reliability and inconsistent judgments. Other criticisms include the lack of universal decision rule and the lack of any meaningful statistics. The solution to all of the previously listed problems may lie in a standard ratio graph. The following experiment examines the extent to which behavior analysts could accurately detect a trend and reliability make a decision based on three conditions: a linear graph with a trend, a linear graph with a quantified slope, and a ratio graph with a celeration value. The results and implications of the study suggest a healthy path forward for visual analysis and the analysis, evaluation, and communication of data via ratio graphs.

[su_accordion]
[su_spoiler title=”About the Speaker” open=”no” style=”default” icon=”plus”]
Rick Kubina Jr., Ph.D, BCBA-D is CentralReach’s Director of Research and a Professor of Special Education at The Pennsylvania State University where he teaches courses on methods for teaching reading, behavior analysis, and experimental design. Rick graduated from Youngstown State University where he had Steve Graf as an advisor and then received a Masters and Ph.D. from The Ohio State University under John Cooper. Rick conducts wide-ranging research in the area of Applied Behavior Analysis and Precision Teaching. He also served as the editor of the Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration. Rick has dedicated his professional career to helping behavior change agents such as teachers, behavior analysts, and other helping professionals efficiently change behavior through effective teaching and measurement such as Precision Teaching. Rick co-founded a software called Chartlytics, which was acquired by CentralReach in 2018. At CentralReach, Rick explores how technology can accelerate superior outcomes for all those seeking to engender professional and personal success and his ongoing research will help shape the future of CentralReach’s clinical solutions.
[/su_spoiler]

[su_spoiler title=”Survey Results” open=”no” style=”default” icon=”plus”]
[surveyresults module=”An Examination of Linear and Ratio Graphs”]
[/su_spoiler]
[/su_accordion]

Toward an Understanding of Assent with Individuals with Communication Disabilities (Standard)

Dr. Cody Morris

Seeking and obtaining assent from clients and research participants is an important component of behavior analytic practice and research. However, typical assent procedures primarily rely on spoken and written communication that may not be feasible for individuals with significant communication difficulties. Thus, practitioners serving individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and related developmental disabilities (DD) who have limited communication abilities may need to utilize alternative methods for seeking assent. The purpose of this presentation is to introduce assent and related terms and concepts, discuss the importance of assent, and propose practical strategies for obtaining assent with clients who cannot assent through traditional means.

[su_accordion]
[su_spoiler title=”About the Speakers” open=”no” style=”default” icon=”plus”]
Dr. Cody Morris is an Assistant Professor and Graduate Program Director of Applied Behavior Analysis at Salve Regina University. He earned his doctorate in Behavior Analysis at Western Michigan University, where he studied under Dr. Stephanie Peterson. Cody’s primary research interest is improving the practice of behavior analysis – which involves improving assessment and treatment techniques for challenging behavior, identifying and addressing barriers to practice, and exploring conceptual issues related to practice.

Jessica J. Detrick, M.A., BCBA, LBA, is a doctoral student in Clinical Psychology at Western Michigan University. She received her B.A. (2016) from the University of Iowa and M.A. (2018) from the University of Missouri. Jessica is a Project Coordinator and Clinical Supervisor of the Psychological Assessment and Treatment Services (PATS) team. PATS is a team of BCBAs working with Integrated Services of Kalamazoo who provide consultative services to adult and children consumers with developmental disabilities, mental illness, and emotional behavior disorders who engage in challenging behaviors.
[/su_spoiler]

[su_spoiler title=”Survey Results” open=”no” style=”default” icon=”plus”]
[surveyresults module=”Toward an Understanding of Assent with Individuals with Communication Disabilities”]
[/su_spoiler]
[/su_accordion]

Immediate Feedback: A Misconception of a Recommended Practice (Standard)

Dr. Elian Aljadeff

Feedback is a common and evidence-based practice to improve performance. While feedback is widely used and researched in the training and educational settings, the literature does not provide a clear and consistent definition for feedback. Due to the unclear definition, two misconceptions are evident in the feedback literature: (a) immediate feedback is more effective then delayed feedback, and (b) feedback serves as a consequence to behavior. In this talk the misconceptions of immediate feedback and the function of feedback will be discussed in light of the vague definition of feedback in the behavioral literature. A clearer definition which meets all seven dimensions of applied behavior analysis will be suggested and recent study results will be presented to propose that feedback serves as an antecedent to performance and therefore should be provided immediately before the behavior. The talk will end with a number of suggestions for future research.

[su_accordion]
[su_spoiler title=”About the Speaker” open=”no” style=”default” icon=”plus”]
Elian is a lecturer in the B.A. program in Behavioral Sciences and the M.A. program Applied Behavioral Analysis at the School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Kinneret Academic college. Elian’s areas of interest are the application of ABA in education and training, self-management, and system analysis.
[/su_spoiler]

[su_spoiler title=”Survey Results” open=”no” style=”default” icon=”plus”]
[surveyresults module=”Immediate Feedback: A Misconception of a Recommended Practice”]
[/su_spoiler]
[/su_accordion]

Making Data Easy in Classroom Settings (Standard)

Jason Guild

In many schools and clinical settings, staff report that they collect data frequently but aren’t sure what the data they collect are used for or how it leads to changes in student or client programming. At New Story Schools Ohio (formerly Haugland Learning Center), we focus on collecting and organizing data to maximize student progress and make sure staff who work with students directly are involved in the entire process. Three types of assessment are used to gain a clear picture of student performance: micro, meso, and macro. Classroom staff receive frequent coaching and feedback regarding instruction, assessment and data collection. In addition, meta analysis of all levels of classroom data is performed regularly. This presentation focuses on how data collection and analysis can be done easily and efficiently to ensure maximum student progress. Examples, challenges, and successes will be discussed.

[su_accordion]
[su_spoiler title=”About the Speaker” open=”no” style=”default” icon=”plus”]
Jason Guild has served in several roles at Haugland Learning Center for the last 11 years, including classroom aide, teacher and teacher coach. Data analysis is his favorite part of his job. He also works as a consultant for Morningside Teachers’ Academy. In his spare time, Jason enjoys watching auto racing and playing with his little boy, Jacob.
[/su_spoiler]

[su_spoiler title=”Survey Results” open=”no” style=”default” icon=”plus”]
[surveyresults module=”Making Data Easy in Classroom Settings”]
[/su_spoiler]
[/su_accordion]

Conceptualizing Self-Determination from a Behavior Analytic Perspective (Standard)

Dr. Stephanie Peterson

We found that in most cases, people consider the goal of education to be developing a self-determined individual. Self-determination is an abstract term. Behavior analysts may find this term difficult to define. Therefore, it may be difficult to observe and measure whether “self-determined behaviors” have developed. Many other service providers use this term frequently; thus, behavior analysts working with these service providers must come to terms with this concept in order to better collaborate. We argue that self-determination can be operationally defined with the concepts of choice, self-control, and self-management. By using the measurable behaviors included in these concepts, we believe that services can be developed to teach self-determination skills. This presentation, based on a paper published in 2020, explores these concepts and how they can contribute to an operational definition of self-determination, and ultimately, help behavior analysts work with other providers to effectively teach self-determination to individuals with developmental disabilities.

About the Speaker

Dr. Stephanie Peterson is chair and professor for the Department of Psychology at Western Michigan University, as well as a member of the behavior analysis faculty. She earned her doctorate in Special Education at The University of Iowa in 1994. Her primary research interests are choice making, functional communication training, reinforcement-based interventions for children with problem behavior, and concurrent schedules of reinforcement in the treatment of severe problem behavior and in functional analysis of problem behavior. She also has interests in applications of behavior analysis to educational interventions and teacher training. She currently serves on the Editorial Board of the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis and is a Senior Editorial Consultant for Education and Treatment of Children.

Chomsky vs. Skinner: In Their Own Words (Standard)

Man, woman, Chomsky vs. Skinner

In 1957, B.F. Skinner published the book Verbal Behavior. In 1959, a young linguist named Noam Chomsky published a review of that book, sharply criticizing Skinner’s behaviorism in general and his behavioral approach to language acquisition in particular. Chomsky’s review became arguably more influential and well-known than Skinner’s book, and it played a key role in the “cognitive revolution” that soon came to dominate both psychology and linguistics.

The debate between the pragmatism of Skinner and the structuralism of Chomsky continues to this day. Now hear directly from both men, in a series of archival interviews and speeches spanning several decades, as they address the philosophical and practical differences between their approaches. Topics addressed include:

  • Verbal behavior, linguistics, and language acquisition
  • Structuralism
  • Morality
  • Nature vs. nurture
  • Fascism and racism
  • Rule-governed behavior
  • Universal grammar

Based on a video originally edited and posted to YouTube by Ariel Raphaeli in 2012.

Using Behavioral Science to Improve Fidelity of Implementation of Behavior Support Plans in Schools (Standard)

Dr. Wendy Machalicek

Abstract

Treatment fidelity, or the extent to which the intervention is implemented as intended, is widely regarded as essential for improving child outcomes in school settings. Treatment fidelity includes the components of adherence, dosage, quality of programs/intervention delivery, participant responsiveness, and program differentiation. The systematic implementation of functional behavior assessment (FBA) and multi-component behavioral intervention plans for children with autism spectrum disorder can pose a fidelity of implementation challenge for classroom teachers and schools due to the relatively intensive amount of effort required for teachers to acquire new knowledge and skills and implement individualized plans with high fidelity. When we ask a teacher, parent, or other adult change agent to implement an intervention, they may implement the intervention with fidelity, prematurely abandon the intervention, implement the intervention incorrectly, or implement the intervention with lower fidelity than is necessary to achieve positive outcomes. For children with autism spectrum disorder who engage in challenging behavior that disrupts their learning or the learning of their peers, the effective treatment of challenging behavior can remove barriers to learning and improve classroom climate. This talk reviews the behavioral science literature related to interventions targeting improved implementation fidelity in school and other settings, situates the treatment challenges of teachers addressing challenging behavior in schools alongside this literature, and provides suggestions for future research and practice to ultimately improve behavioral and academic outcomes for children with autism spectrum disorder.

About the Speaker

Wendy Machalicek, Ph.D., BCBA-D is an Associate Professor in the Department of Special Education and Clinical Sciences and is affiliated with the HEDCO Clinic and the National Center on PBIS in the College of Education at the University of Oregon. She received her Ph.D. in Special Education with a specialization in autism and developmental disabilities from the University of Texas at Austin in 2008. Her scholarship focuses on single-case research methods and the assessment and treatment of challenging behavior of children with autism and other developmental disabilities with an emphasis on supporting teachers and parents in implementing evidence-based practices. Her work is currently funded by the U.S. Department of Education Institute for Education Sciences and the Office of Special Education Programs. She is Editor-in-Chief of Developmental Neurorehabilitation, an Associate Editor for Remedial and Special Education, and on the international advisory board of Cochrane Rehabilitation.

Safe and secure online payment

Visa
MasterCard
Apple Pay
Google Pay

help-solid Excellent customer support

    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop
      Apply Coupon