Ethics of Standardization of Practice (Matthew Brodhead)

The standardization of decision-making in behavior-analytic practice may reduce practitioner effort while simultaneously freeing resources to engage in other, and perhaps more complex, tasks. However, the extent to which standardized processes for decision-making improve practitioner performance, and subsequently improve client outcomes, is not quite clear. Furthermore, the ethical implications of standardizing decision-making processes require careful consideration. The purpose of this presentation is to present three recent research studies on the standardization of decision-making in behavior analysis, using visual analysis as a case example. The purpose and results of the reviewed studies will be discussed in the context of ethical and professional issues (e.g., scope of competence, the right to effective treatment, and individualized behavior-change programs) that are at the forefront of practicing-behavior analysts.
hide abstract
Matthew T. Brodhead, Ph.D., BCBA-D
Presented at the 2019 Michigan Autism Conference
show abstract
×
This is the open-access version of this video and your completion of it is not recorded. It also does not contain embedded questions or interactions like the CEU and coursepack versions. If you purchased the CEU or coursepack version, you should access it from the myLearning dashboard.
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
X