Predictors of Burnout, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover in Behavior Technicians Working with Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder
$10.00
Read the following article and pass a 6-question quiz on it:
Novack, M. N., & Dixon, D. R. (2019). Predictors of burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover in behavior technicians working with individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 6, 413-421.
Description
To earn credit, you will be required to read the article and pass a 6-question quiz about it. You can retake the quiz as many times as needed, but you will not receive exactly the same questions each time.
Abstract
Frequent turnover of behavior technicians working with individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may have negative impacts on organizations, staff, and patients. The current paper set out to conduct a systematic review of predictors of staff retention in behavior technicians. Two databases were searched to identify studies relating to retention, turnover, burnout, and job satisfaction across samples of behavior technicians working with individuals with ASD. Of the 33 articles identified, 5 studies met inclusion criteria. A number of employee and organizational factors were identified as predictors of burnout, job satisfaction, and intention to turnover in behavior technicians. These findings are informative for hiring practices, ongoing supervision, and support of behavior technicians working with individuals with ASD.
33 reviews for Predictors of Burnout, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover in Behavior Technicians Working with Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
You may also like…
-
1 Total CEU1 Supervision CEU
Are You Providing SUPER-vision?
(33)$20.00 Add to cartquick view -
1 Total CEU1 Supervision CEU
Should You Order the Feedback Sandwich? Efficacy of Feedback Sequence and Timing
(19)$10.00 Add to cartquick view -
1.5 Total CEUs1.5 Supervision CEUs
Performance Management in Clinical Settings
(11)$30.00 Add to cartquick view -
1 Total CEU1 Supervision CEU
What’s in a Name? Exploring What it Means to Supervise
(8)$20.00 Add to cartquick view
Related products
-
3.5 Total CEUs3.5 Ethics CEUs
A Case Study in the Misrepresentation of Applied Behavior Analysis in Autism: The Gernsbacher Lectures
(46)$35.00 Add to cartquick view -
1.5 Total CEUs1.5 Ethics CEUs
Establishing Consumer Protections for Research in Human Service Agencies
(10)$15.00 Add to cartquick view -
0.5 CEU
On the Use of Fluency Training in the Behavioral Treatment of Autism: A Commentary
(16)$5.00 Add to cartquick view -
1 CEU
Evidence-Based Practice: Myths and Realities
(11)$20.00 Add to cartquick view
Enjoyed this article! Was surprised with the results, and loved the variety of factors that were considered.
Easy-to-read article that offers direction on subjective, yet paramount, issues in our field.
Great article, easy to read and practical implications for immediate application!
I really don’t like how a singular error causes your score to be reduced by 2 points. During most quizes it doesn’t make a difference because you have to retake the quiz even if you get one wrong, but getting your score reduced by ‘2’ when you only got 1 question incorrect. What it “appears” to be doing is reducing the score by ‘1’ for selecting the incorrect answer and additionally reducing your score by ‘1’ for not selecting the correct answer. Might just be a technology adjustment?
That is not how our quiz scoring works. Some questions, however, have multiple correct answers (“check all that apply” type questions) and are worth multiple points. Thus, on those questions you can have your score reduced by 2 or more points if you do not select 2 or more of the possible correct answers (i.e., your score is not reduced by multiple points for making a “singular error” — it is reduced by multiple points for making multiple errors). If you believe a quiz is being scored incorrectly, please contact our helpdesk with a description and evidence of your claim.
Interesting read!