Predictors of Burnout, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover in Behavior Technicians Working with Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder
$10.00
BCBA CEUs: 1 Total CEU | 1 Supervision CEU
Read the following article and pass a 6-question quiz on it:
Novack, M. N., & Dixon, D. R. (2019). Predictors of burnout, job satisfaction, and turnover in behavior technicians working with individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 6, 413-421.
Brand: CEUniverse
Description
To earn credit, you will be required to read the article and pass a 6-question quiz about it. You can retake the quiz as many times as needed, but you will not receive exactly the same questions each time.
Abstract
Frequent turnover of behavior technicians working with individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may have negative impacts on organizations, staff, and patients. The current paper set out to conduct a systematic review of predictors of staff retention in behavior technicians. Two databases were searched to identify studies relating to retention, turnover, burnout, and job satisfaction across samples of behavior technicians working with individuals with ASD. Of the 33 articles identified, 5 studies met inclusion criteria. A number of employee and organizational factors were identified as predictors of burnout, job satisfaction, and intention to turnover in behavior technicians. These findings are informative for hiring practices, ongoing supervision, and support of behavior technicians working with individuals with ASD.
37 reviews for Predictors of Burnout, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover in Behavior Technicians Working with Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Sorry, no reviews match your current selections
Leave a Comment Cancel reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Related products
-
1.5 BCBA CEUs
Navigating a Managed Care Peer Review
4.50 out of 5(2)$15.00 Add to cart -
1.5 BCBA CEUs
Relational Frame Theory and Skinner’s Verbal Behavior: A Possible Synthesis
4.56 out of 5(16)$15.00 Add to cart -
0.5 BCBA CEU
Teaching Effective Hand Raising to Children with Autism During Group Instruction
4.65 out of 5(23)$5.00 Add to cart -
3.5 Total BCBA CEUs
3.5 Ethics CEUsA Case Study in the Misrepresentation of Applied Behavior Analysis in Autism: The Gernsbacher Lectures
4.40 out of 5(50)$35.00 Add to cart
Enjoyed this article! Was surprised with the results, and loved the variety of factors that were considered.
Easy-to-read article that offers direction on subjective, yet paramount, issues in our field.
Great article, easy to read and practical implications for immediate application!
I really don’t like how a singular error causes your score to be reduced by 2 points. During most quizes it doesn’t make a difference because you have to retake the quiz even if you get one wrong, but getting your score reduced by ‘2’ when you only got 1 question incorrect. What it “appears” to be doing is reducing the score by ‘1’ for selecting the incorrect answer and additionally reducing your score by ‘1’ for not selecting the correct answer. Might just be a technology adjustment?
That is not how our quiz scoring works. Some questions, however, have multiple correct answers (“check all that apply” type questions) and are worth multiple points. Thus, on those questions you can have your score reduced by 2 or more points if you do not select 2 or more of the possible correct answers (i.e., your score is not reduced by multiple points for making a “singular error” — it is reduced by multiple points for making multiple errors). If you believe a quiz is being scored incorrectly, please contact our helpdesk with a description and evidence of your claim.
Helpful information to know what may and may not lead to BT turn over. I’d love to see future research in this direction.
This was a helpful tool to identify what areas of our organization we can improve on to decrease burnout in technicians.
The article was informative overall and the review questions helped highlight the main points.
Enjoyed this article especially that it took both employee and organization characteristics into consideration.
Interesting read!
Very interesting read, lots of great information