How to Systematically Evaluate Treatments for Autism That Lack an Evidence Base

Matthew Brodhead

How to Systematically Evaluate Treatments for Autism That Lack an Evidence Base

Matthew Brodhead

$20.00

A presentation by Dr. Matthew Brodhead delivered at the 2016 Michigan Autism Conference

1 CEU
A portion of the proceeds from this video goes directly to the Michigan Autism Conference
Purchase 5+ CEU modules to earn a bulk discount
Purchase now and earn 20 Foxypoints

SKU: brodhead2016-c Categories: , Tags: ,

Free Preview

Below is the entire open access version of this video. It does not contain embedded questions or interactions like the CEU version of the module.

Description

Abstract

With over 400 treatments for autism, behavior analysts are sometimes placed in a position where they must monitor the effects of alternative or ancillary treatments that lack an evidence base. Behavior analysts must be mindful about how they evaluate treatments that lack an evidence base in order to determine whether or not they produce desired outcomes. This presentation will provide an overview of research methods to evaluate such treatments and will highlight notable research studies that evaluated questionable treatments (e.g., weighted vests and sensory integration) for individuals with autism.

About the Speaker

Matthew T. Brodhead, Ph.D., BCBA-D, is an Assistant Professor at Michigan State University. His research examines the behavioral determinants of response variability and decision-making in children with autism. He is also interested in research and conceptual issues relating to the ethical and professional behaviors of practicing behavior analysts. Through workshops and consultation, he has established multiple school-based programs for children with autism, and he has provided training to teachers, related service providers, and behavior analysts throughout the United States.

Shopping Cart
There are no products in the cart!
Continue Shopping
★ Judge.me Reviews

Let customers speak for us

3562 reviews
47%
(1672)
39%
(1393)
10%
(350)
2%
(86)
2%
(61)
Amazing