Establishing Consumer Protections for Research in Human Service Agencies

Linda A. LeBlanc, Melissa R. Nosik, & Anna Petursdottir
1.5 Learning, Ethics CEUs | Article Quiz
4.50 out of 5
(6 customer reviews)

$15.00

Read the following article and pass a 7-question quiz on it:

LeBlanc, L. A., Nosik, M. R., & Petursdottir, A. (2018). Establishing consumer protections for research in human service agencies. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 11, 445-455.

Purchase 5+ CEU modules to earn a bulk discount
Buy now to earn 15 FoxyPoints and save $1.50 next time!

Gift This Module »

Buy a friend or colleague a gift card for this module!

SKU: leblanc2018-c Category: Tags: , , , ,
Brand: FoxyLearning

Description

To earn credit, you will be required to read the article and pass a 7-question quiz about it. You can retake the quiz as many times as needed, but you will not receive exactly the same questions each time.

Abstract

Conducting research in practice settings is the primary mechanism for establishing a strong foundation of evidence for clinical decision making. In behavior analysis, this type of research frequently originates from university-based systems that have established institutional review boards. Independent human service agencies that want to contribute applied research to the literature base that is clinically meaningful and conducted in an ethical fashion must establish a research review committee (RRC). The purpose of this article is to provide information and guidance for establishing and maintaining the activity of an RRC in a human service setting.

Read the article below or download it directly. The module also includes a 7-question quiz about this article that you must pass to earn credit.

6 reviews for Establishing Consumer Protections for Research in Human Service Agencies

4.5
4.50 out of 5
Based on 6 reviews
5 star
50
50%
4 star
50
50%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
Showing 3 of 6 reviews (5 star). See all 6 reviews
  1. Avatar
    4 out of 5

    Leah Robertson (verified buyer)

    Helpful if you are considering practice-based research.

    (0) (0)
  2. Avatar
    5 out of 5

    Kevin Russo (verified buyer)

    Excellent reminders of what informed consent should look like.

    (0) (0)
  3. Avatar
    5 out of 5

    Hattie Singleton (verified buyer)

    The article was very informative.

    (0) (0)
  4. Avatar
    5 out of 5

    Becky Fields (verified buyer)

    Great explanation of RRC.

    (0) (0)
  5. Avatar
    4 out of 5

    Marc Fields (verified buyer)

    Good article

    (0) (0)

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

Cancel

Below are live results from the voluntary survey users are asked to complete at the end of this module.

help-solid Excellent customer support

Safe and secure online payment

Shopping cart
Your cart is empty.