Establishing Consumer Protections for Research in Human Service Agencies
$15.00
Read the following article and pass a 7-question quiz on it:
LeBlanc, L. A., Nosik, M. R., & Petursdottir, A. (2018). Establishing consumer protections for research in human service agencies. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 11, 445-455.
Description
To earn credit, you will be required to read the article and pass a 7-question quiz about it. You can retake the quiz as many times as needed, but you will not receive exactly the same questions each time.
Abstract
Conducting research in practice settings is the primary mechanism for establishing a strong foundation of evidence for clinical decision making. In behavior analysis, this type of research frequently originates from university-based systems that have established institutional review boards. Independent human service agencies that want to contribute applied research to the literature base that is clinically meaningful and conducted in an ethical fashion must establish a research review committee (RRC). The purpose of this article is to provide information and guidance for establishing and maintaining the activity of an RRC in a human service setting.
Full Article
Read the article below or download it directly. The module also includes a 7-question quiz about this article that you must pass to earn credit.
You may also like…
-
1 CEU
Favors, Facts, and Fishnets: Shaping Autism Law and Policy
$20.00 Add to cartquick view -
6 CEUs
An Introduction to Relational Frame Theory
(484)$60.00 Add to cartquick view -
1.5 CEUs
Chomsky vs. Skinner: In Their Own Words
(14)$15.00 Add to cartquick view -
2.5 Total CEUs2.5 Ethics CEUs
Moral Behavior and the Development of Verbal Regulation
(13)$25.00 Add to cartquick view
Related products
-
1.5 CEUs
Cooper, Heron, and Heward’s Applied Behavior Analysis (2nd ed.): Checkered Flag for Students and Professors, Yellow Flag for the Field
(13)$15.00 Add to cartquick view -
1 Total CEU1 Supervision CEU
Predictors of Burnout, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover in Behavior Technicians Working with Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder
(33)$10.00 Add to cartquick view -
1.5 Total CEUs1.5 Ethics CEUs
Ethics of Punishment Panel Discussion
(22)$30.00 Add to cartquick view -
3.5 Total CEUs3.5 Ethics CEUs
A Case Study in the Misrepresentation of Applied Behavior Analysis in Autism: The Gernsbacher Lectures
(46)$35.00 Add to cartquick view
Excellent ethics course reminding proper ways to protect our clients
Helpful if you are considering practice-based research.
Excellent reminders of what informed consent should look like.
Great explanation of RRC.
I really don’t like how a singular error causes your score to be reduced by 2 points. During most quizes it doesn’t make a difference because you have to retake the quiz even if you get one wrong, but getting your score reduced by ‘2’ when you only got 1 question incorrect. What it “appears” to be doing is reducing the score by ‘1’ for selecting the incorrect answer and additionally reducing your score by ‘1’ for not selecting the correct answer. Might just be a technology adjustment?
That is not how our quiz scoring works. Some questions, however, have multiple correct answers (“check all that apply” type questions) and are worth multiple points. Thus, on those questions you can have your score reduced by 2 or more points if you do not select 2 or more of the possible correct answers (i.e., your score is not reduced by multiple points for making a “singular error” — it is reduced by multiple points for making multiple errors). If you believe a quiz is being scored incorrectly, please contact our helpdesk with a description and evidence of your claim.