A Case Study in the Misrepresentation of Applied Behavior Analysis in Autism: The Gernsbacher Lectures

Edward K. Morris

A Case Study in the Misrepresentation of Applied Behavior Analysis in Autism: The Gernsbacher Lectures

Edward K. Morris

$9.00

Read the following article and pass a short quiz on it:

Morris, E. K. (2009). A case study in the misrepresentation of applied behavior analysis in autism: The Gernsbacher lectures. The Behavior Analyst, 32, 205-240.

1 Ethics CEU
Purchase 5+ CEU modules to earn a bulk discount
Purchase now and earn 9 Foxypoints

SKU: morris2009 Category: Tags: ,

Description

To earn credit, you will be required to read the article and pass a 5-question quiz about it. You can retake the quiz as many times as needed, but you will not receive exactly the same questions each time.

Abstract

This article presents a case study in the misrepresentation of applied behavior analysis for autism based on Morton Ann Gernsbacher’s presentation of a lecture titled ‘‘The Science of Autism: Beyond the Myths and Misconceptions.’’ Her misrepresentations involve the characterization of applied behavior analysis, descriptions of practice guidelines, reviews of the treatment literature, presentations of the clinical trials research, and conclusions about those trials (e.g., children’s improvements are due to development, not applied behavior analysis). The article also reviews applied behavior analysis’ professional endorsements and research support, and addresses issues in professional conduct. It ends by noting the deleterious effects that misrepresenting any research on autism (e.g., biological, developmental, behavioral) have on our understanding and treating it in a transdisciplinary context.

Free Preview

Read the article below or download it directly. The module also includes a 5-question quiz about this article that you must pass to earn credit.

Bhan 32 01 205

Customer Reviews

Based on 14 reviews
50%
(7)
43%
(6)
0%
(0)
0%
(0)
7%
(1)
L
L.B.
D
D.N.
S
S.F.
35 Pages Long. I read the whole thing
P
P.C.
M
M.S.
A good article
★ Judge.me Reviews

Let customers speak for us

3558 reviews
47%
(1668)
39%
(1393)
10%
(350)
2%
(86)
2%
(61)
Amazing