Daniel J. Moran & Wendi Tai

Reducing Biases in Clinical Judgment with Single-Subject Treatment Design

(4 customer reviews)


Read the following article and pass a short quiz on it:

Moran, D. J., & Tai, W. (2001). Reducing biases in clinical judgment with single-subject treatment design. The Behavior Analyst Today, 2(3), 196-203.


Purchase now and earn 9 Foxypoints

To earn credit, you will be required to read the article and pass a 6-question quiz about it with a score of 80% or higher. You can retake the quiz as many times as needed, but you will not receive exactly the same questions each time.


Psychological literature exposes a number of biases that can influence one’s judgment (e.g., pathology bias, confirmatory bias, hindsight bias, misestimation of covariance, decision heuristics, false consensus effect, and over-confidence in clinical judgment). Clinical judgment, the subjective method of arranging client data to establish a diagnosis and a treatment plan, can also be biased and may lead to inaccurate assessment and inefficient treatment. Taking repeated measures of symptoms, similar to the single subjects research design used in the behavioral sciences, may lead to better therapy because it reduces judgment bias.

Free Preview

Read the article below or download it directly. The module also includes a 6-question quiz about this article that you must pass to earn credit.


4 reviews for Reducing Biases in Clinical Judgment with Single-Subject Treatment Design

  1. Avatar

    Nathan Hahn (verified owner)

  2. Iantha E Fusilier M.A., BCBA (verified owner)

  3. Mariko Holmes Okano (verified owner)

  4. Daniel Moran

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

Your Cart